Wave

 O'Day Tempest Yacht Restoration
A Chronicle of the Restoration of Tempestuous

cool
  
In This Site

Home
Tools
Links
News
Feedback
Names
Project Lists
About
Sailing
Tiny Tempest
O'Day Outlaw
Boat Yard Journal
Product Guide
Tempest Pictures
Tempest Brochure
Launching
Rigging
Phillip Rhodes Research

 

Phillip Rhodes Naval Architects

Design No. 756 O'Day Tempest

bullet

I have been lucky enough to view the entire set of drawings for the O'Day Tempest that designer Phillip Rhodes drew for the O'Day Corporation. They are housed in the archives of Mystic Seaport and can be seen by appointment in their ships plans office. They charge a $12.00 photocopy fee if you want to take some home with you. www.mysticseaport.org

bullet

This biography is taken verbatim from Ben Stavis's Phillip Rhodes webpage located at

bullet

http://astro.temple.edu/%7Ebstavis/pr/rhodes.htm

bullet

Please visit his wonderful site and commend him for all his hard work!

 

bullet

Also read below excerpts on the Outlaw and Tempest Class from Richard Henderson's Book on Phil Rhodes Designs.

Philip L. Rhodes Analytical Biography

Philip L. Rhodes, born in 1895,  was a prolific and versatile boat designer, whose career spanned more than five decades from 1919 until his death in 1974.  His range of design was amazing, from 123'  motorsailers to 7' dinghies, from hydrofoil racers to giant motor yachts.  His clients ranged from Rockefellers to Sears and Roebuck.  His 12 Meter Weatherly won the America's Cup in 1962.  And, in addition, he designed a wide range of commercial craft.

His biographer Richard Henderson emphasizes that Rhodes was not only an excellent engineer but also a true artist.  "Whatever kind of vessel he produced, it invariably had the look of rightness about it.  His sailing yachts in particular, with their beautifully proportioned hulls and graceful sheerlines, are works of true design harmony.  Not only are Rhodes yachts handsome; they somehow appear to be uniquely suited to their purpose… Phil will be remembered best for this distinguished thoroughbred yachts.  They are not only superbly functional, but they also have an elegance and ageless beauty that is all to rare in yacht design today."

Henderson concludes his book with this generalization:  "It is difficult to pigeonhole Rhodes, because his designs are so varied, but in general his work in the field of seagoing sailing yachts seems to fall somewhere between Alden and Stephens.  A Rhodes boat might be described as being a bit heavier, more comfortable, often more graceful, and not quite as racy as one by Stephens.  On the other hand, a Rhodes boat may be thought of as being lighter, yachtier, more expensively built, and a better all-round perfumer than the kind of boat one associates with Alden.  Of course, these are gross generalizations, and there are many individual exceptions."   (Richard Henderson, Philip L. Rhodes and his Yacht Designs.  Camden: International Marine, 1981.)

 Philip Rhodes, on right, makes a point. Photo from family collection of Dan Rhodes (grandson), with many thanks.

 

This discussion, drawing on material in Henderson's book, will emphasize his designs of racing cruising sailboats from roughly the 1930's through the 1960's in the 25-65 foot range.  His boats in this range won numerous ocean races (Bermuda, Trans-Atlantic) and short races and cruised successfully on lakes, coasts, and oceans.  They have high, nicely curved bows, well defined sheers dropping  fairly low in the mid-ships to after third, and rising gracefully  to a  buoyant stern.  The profiles of the boats are distinctive and similar enough to be big and little sister ships.  By today's standards, the hulls are relatively narrow and heavy, resulting in a more comfortable motion in a seaway than the light, wide, high  modern boats.  Rhodes' boats have a good turn of speed, easily reaching their hull speeds with modest breezes.

While the boats are quite similar in profile, the Rhodes boats are different.  With a great deal of oversimplification, overlooking questions of displacement, keel shape, and rig, the boats fall into five groups:

1. Rhodes' basic hull form was remarkably stable from the late 1920's to the early 1960s.  It was a fairly narrow hull, with the lwl roughly 2.7 to 3 times the beam.  (The bigger boats in this series generally are relatively narrower, gaining stability from greater weight.).   The Rhodes 27 designed in 1938 had a beam of 9'8" for a 27 foot waterline.  Caper, one of Rhodes' favorite boats, was only 12' wide for a lwl of 38' (and a loa of 56').  In the smaller size boats, this hull form is seen in the Ranger and Chesapeake 32.  (green marks on the chart)

2. Rhodes designed a few boats that were quite a bit narrower, mainly for inland lake racing, day sailing, and overnight cruising.  The Great Lakes 30 was a little over 29' on the water line but only 7'9" in beam. The Rhodes 33, developed for Southern California, falls in this group.  (red marks on the chart)

3. Rhodes also designed a series of centerboarders with somewhat more beam than his standard hull form.   Generally the lwl was 2.5 to 2.8 times the beam.  This model was well defined with Ayesha (1932) and refined in Alondra (1936).   The model had enough of a keel for ocean-going stability, but still were shoal draft boats. Alondra played a key role in popularizing the keel-centerboard concept in a strange way.  Alondra was purchased by Carleton Mitchell in 1947 and renamed Caribbee.  She was raced very successfully and cruised extensively.  For a variety of reasons, more related to racing and rigging than hull form, Mitchell went to Sparkman and Stephens for his next boat, Finisterre. Olin Stephens based Finisterre's centerboard hull very much on the Rhodes Alondra model that had so satisfied Mitchell.

Rhodes developed the centerboard in a full range of sizes.  Perhaps the most famous in this series was Carina II, with a waterline of 36'3", 2.79 times its 13' beam.  A smaller version of Carina II was Design No. 618, with a water line of  32' and beam of 11'9', for a ratio of 2.72.  Several boats were built to this design.   Rhodes carried this theme to Erewhon, with a 29' waterline and 11'3" beam.  In fiberglass, the Swiftsure was an even smaller version of the Rhodes centerboarder concept.  Swiftsure had a waterline of 22'11" and a beam of 10'.  These beamier boats were not fat.  On a 29 foot water line, Rhodes gave the narrow version (Altair) a 10'6" beam; the centerboarder (Erewhon) had a beam of 11'3", just 9 inches more.   (purple marks on the chart)

4. Over the years and decades, Rhodes seemed to give boats slightly more beam, an inch or two here or there.  By the 1960's, he had a boat that might be considered a new design.  It was noticeably beamier than his earlier models, but not quite as beamy as the centerboarders.  The Rhodes Reliant, designed in 1963,  defined this new, "medium"  model.   The gradual increase in the beam for the Reliant can be seen in his evolution of the 28' waterline.   In the 1930s, Rhodes gave a 28' waterline boat a  9'8" beam on Surf Bird and a 9'10" beam on a Rhodes Cutter;  Bounty II had a beam of 10'3" (in 1956); Copacetic in 1962 had 10'6" beam.  The Reliant, in 1963, had a 10'9" beam. This medium hull form also was evident in the smaller Vanguard. (blue marks on the chart)

5. Another, quite different design breakthrough of Rhodes was the large, full powered, cruising, centerboard ketch, made of steel.  These vessels are in the 60' to 100' range.  Drawing only 5 to 6 1/2 feet, they can get into shallow habors but are secure in ocean passages.  Needless to say, they have very comfortable accomodations.  The first of these boats was Tamaris (1937).  After the War Rhodes designed a 77 footer, and then both smaller and larger vessels of this concept, some with twin screws. In the "Classic Resotrations" portion of this website, this design is illustrated by:

Tamaris (design #423)
Kanaloa (design #712)
Rainbow (design #744)
Cacilque (design #785)

From today's perspective, it seems strange that almost none of Rhodes' designs, not even the largest sail and motor yachts, has a  double bed!  No matter how large and elegant the cabins, even if they were double cabins, they had two (distantly) separated beds, and not very wide at that.  On the boats in the 70 to 100+ foot range, there is room for a bath tub in the owner's cabin and two narrow bunks almost 20 feet apart!  On Copperhead, he came close to having a near double bed, but deliberately made it narrower and put in a "stowage bin" instead.  Obviously the constraint was not space.  According to Charles Jannace, the reason for no double beds was simple: clients didn't ask for them.  In those days, among his clients, a yacht seems to have been more for racing and adventure at sea.  It wasn't the place for family togetherness or sexual exploits.  Rhodes designed boats for sailing, with narrow, secure beds at sea.  His clients had other places for their families and rendezvous.

Rhodes did put in a double bed in a few boats as part of a distinctive inerior, with a linear galley to starboard and a dinette to port in which the table can drop down and form a double bed.  This design first shows up in Olsching and some of her sisterships including Piera and Masker  (design 618) built in 1953-56 and later in Firande, 1957 (design 666).  This inteior enabled the Reliant, 1963 (design 753), to have three separate cabins and a double bed.  This same idea of dinette to port and linear galley to starboard is carried into the 45' cruising ketch Meltemi (designed the year after the Reliant) and  the micro cruiser, the Rhodes 22, which also has a small dinette/double bed to port and a galley to starboard.  Design #618,also, has a double bed in the tiny fore peak.

While the large ocean racers captured headlines, Rhodes designed several small day sailers, which have captured thousands of sailors for generations.  The 11 1/2' Penguin, designed in 1933, remains a vigorous class today. Close to 10,000 have been built.  Perhaps the most popular was the Rhodes 19, designed in 1945, with either a centerboard or fin keel.  About 3,200 have been built, and they are actively raced in 16 fleets around the United States.

Rhodes was one of the pioneers in the transition to fiberglass construction.  He adapted his classic designs and designed Bounty II for Coleman Plastics in 1956.  This boat was the first large production sailboat out of fiberglass, and established the viability of fiberglass as a material for large production boats. (The molds were later bought by Pearson and the boat became the R41.)   Over the next four years, the Rhodes office designed five boats for Seafarer Yachts, at that time based in Holland.  These were the Swiftsure (33' centerboarder, 1958), a 35' motor sailor (1959), Ranger (28', 1959), Meridian (24', 1961), and a sailing dinghy (7', 1961).  He also designed the Chesapeake 32 (1958, built in Denmark).  In 1963, he designed several fiberglass boats;   Vanguard (33' for Pearson),  Reliant (41' for Cheoy Lee), and Tempest and Outlaw (23' and 26' for O'Day).   These boats are in remarkably good structural condition even today.  Many have been restored, and the ones that have not are good candidates for such treatment.  They are examples not only of Rhodes' overall design, but also of his early mastery of the new fiberglass material.

The Reliant project brought some stress.  Cheoy Lee made a knock-off from the Rhodes design, marketed as the Offshore 40, and refused to pay design royalties to Rhodes.  Perhaps this soured Rhodes on fiberglass mass production; he did not provide any other designs for fiberglass production classes.  Thus the Bounty II-R41-Reliant were his largest mass produced fiberglass boat.

The early Rhodes boats had very simple (and light) mechanical systems.  They  used kerosene lamps and rudimentary plumbing.   As the decades went by, all the systems and equipment on the boats became more elaborate and heavier, but the hull remained rather static, without additional bouyancy.   The boats set deeper and deeper on their waterlines.

By the 1950's, Philip Rhodes was was not actually designing, but was overseeing a large firm, meeting clients and developing contracts for various projects.  In the sailboat portion of the office, James McCurdy, a  very talented designer, served as head of the Yacht Design Section.  The actual designs of boats followed certain formula and guidelines Rhodes had developed earlier.  Much of the basic design work was done by his son Philip H. ("Bodie") Rhodes (link to Bodie Rhodes obituary).  Detailed layouts and drawings were done by Al Mason, Charles Jannace, and Dick Davis.  Other designers worked on motor yachts, and commercial and military boats.   In addition,  Rhodes' other son Daniel Rhodes did brokerage work in the office.

Philip  Rhodes formally retired in 1970, after 50 years of work.  Even in retirement, he remained tied to his work.  In his correspondence with an owner in late September, 1973, he  was gracious and attentive.  He wrote, "I would like to know where you are going to keep the boat and whether or not you are going to retain the name.  I try awfully hard to keep in touch with my owners.  There are a few more weekends left this season and I hope you will be able to take advantage of them."  When the owners replied to him, Rhodes wrote, "I cannot remember ever receiving a more pleasant, enjoyable and informative and welcome letter as yours of October 4.  You certainly brought me up-to-date on a great many things that are always of interest to a designer who wants to know who is sailing his boats, and far more of the owner's background than one usually gets... I hope that you achieve those plans and eventually take that trip around the world. One of our boats of the same waterline length is now being prepared for such a  trip and I know that she will be a very good boat for it.  We have had several larger boats make the voyage and it must be a great experience....It has been a pleasure ot write you this letter and to tell you about the good ship but I want to conclude by telling you once again how much I appreciate all the nice things you had to say about her.  Anytime I can be of help, please let me know."   Interspersed between these gracious words were suggestions on controlling rust, minimizing electrolysis, trim and ballast, coupled with a detailed explanation of the relationship between length and displacement. 

Philip L. Rhodes died in 1974.

Before Rhodes retired in 1970, he began to phase out his office in the late 1960s.  In 1968, Jim McCurdy and his son Bodie Rhodes left to set up a their own yacht design company (McCurdy and Rhodes).  Mark Ellis came into the gap and worked  for Philip Rhodes for a year.  McCurdy and Rhodes, among other things, continued the Rhodes design work for Seafarer Yachts.  Jim McCurdy died in 1996, and Bodie Rhodes died in 1998.  Jim's son Ian McCurdy continues the family tradition in boat design. 

While this review has emphasized Rhodes' racing/cruising sailboats, he designed many other types of boats and hull forms.  There are  lighter displacement fin keel sailboats, very large cruising ketches, motorsailers, medium and high speed motorboats, racing hydrofoils, etc.  According to Henderson, during World War II, he had responsibilities for Navy auxiliaries, patrol craft, minelayers, minesweepers (including the basic hull for the 172 foot MineSweeper Ocean (MSO) in the early 1950s -- profile plan), school ships, salvage vessels, tugs, barges, and subchasers.  He supervised conversion of large liners into troopships and worked on hospital ships.  Later he worked on a  large line of cargo vessels, fire boats, dredges, steam turbo-propelled vessels for the Yangtze River, etc.  A significant portion of the firm's income came from contracts with the City of New York to design police boats, garbage and sewage barges, etc.  Rhodes designed a 53 foot patrol/rescue launch for the New York City police in the 1960s.  One of them has recently been lovingly and beautifully restored and is again saving lives.   The Rhodes 22 trailorable cruiser doesn't look like a classic Rhodes boat, but somewhere in his vast array of projects, I am sure its antecedents could be discovered.

How did Rhodes conduct business and earn a living?  In 1956, an Australian negotiated with Rhodes about building one of his designs.  The correspondence is available and describes some of the business practices of Rhodes.  Typically, at this time (1956) the fees for the naval architect were 10 percent of the completed cost of the boat.  A designer would know this price if he could supervise the construction.  The cost of construction in places outside the USA was less (e.g. Aberking and Rassmussen in Germany), so  Rhodes asked more, 12.5%, of the completed construction cost for boats built outside the USA.  Philip Rhodes didn't know the costs in Australia, so there were some quotes prepared that must have been sent to Rhodes.  In the end he suggested buying a completed design (#618) rather than a new commission for a 5% rate of the USA building cost - the same price to buy these plans in the USA.

Rhodes at one time or other employed (and certainly influenced) many naval architects who are well known, including Bob Wallstrom, Olin Stephens, Joseph Reinhardt, James McCurdy, Charles Wittholz, Al Mason, Robert Steward, William Tripp, Frederick Bates, Ralph Jackson, Francis Kinney, Richard Davis, Henry Devereaux, Winthrop Warner, Charles Jannace, and Mark Ellis.  Weston Farmer was an associate, and considered Rhodes to be one of the greatest artists who ever lived. 

 

Excerpts on the Tempest and Outlaw Class from Richard Henderson's 1993 Book -  Philip L. Rhodes and His Yacht Designs

 

 

What's New

Welcome to sailthtetempest.com

bulletOutlaw Pictures Posted
bulletSend in your info to be included in the Owners Database
bulletSEND IN YOUR PICTURES AND IDEAS!

sunset

 

2006 Hart Media

 
cool